2026 SPEED TO LEAD REPORT

Speed to lead · Result system

Three reportvariants

Compare every lookup outcome in the same editorial system used by the benchmark and personalized report.

Each example uses the production renderer. Update the shared result experience once, then review measured, unanswered, and unmatched companies together.

01 · Measured response

A complete company benchmark

Use this state when the company is in the dataset and its response time can be measured against the market, industry, and company-size peer group.

All benchmark spectra, observed behaviors, peer comparisons, recommendations, and the primary demo action are visible.

Atlassian

Your speed to lead is 5.7 hours

Best in class companies are < 5 mins. The fastest are < 1 min.

Compared with all companies

Faster than 17% of all measured companies

17th percentile

Compared within Software Development

Industry sample: 3 companies

1st percentile

Compared within 5K+ employees

Company-size sample: 3 companies

33rd percentile

Personalization level

Full

Phone callback

No callback observed

Add a phone call follow-up. You can even have an agent make the call for you.

Form complexity

8 fields

The sweet spot is between 3-5 fields. You can eliminate fields by finding enriched profiles that give you Title, Company, Industry, and use Clay's waterfall to find the mobile number instead of requesting one (and likely getting a bogus #s)

Industry average

2.6 hours

Atlassian is 3.1 hours slower

Company-size average

12.3 hours

Atlassian is 6.6 hours faster

Recommended next steps

What to improve

01

Remove 2 fields from the form

The observed form has 8 fields. Reducing it to 6 gets the form below the 7-field threshold.

02

Add a phone follow-up

No callback was observed. Add a phone touch for high-intent or high-fit submissions so email is not the only response channel.

03

Automate the personalization workflow

The response was fully personalized, but its speed ranks in the 17th percentile overall. Automate research and context gathering so the tailored reply can go out sooner.

This result reflects the observed response in the benchmark and should be read as a directional comparison, not a permanent company score.

02 · No response observed

Turn silence into a next step

Use this state when the company is in the benchmark but no reply was observed. The page shifts from percentile scoring to the follow-up experience.

The result keeps the company context, calls out missing email and phone follow-up, and presents 3 concrete ways to improve.

CSR Limited

You correctly qualified us out!

Explanation

We submitted a real person and analyzed your ICP. We infer the profile is not a good fit for your ICP. This is great and means that you correctly qualified us out and didn't waste your team's time. Nice work.

Email follow-up

No email follow up

Phone follow-up

No callback observed

03 · Company not found

Keep the lookup useful

Use this state when the submitted domain is not present in the benchmark. It avoids invented scoring and offers a clear path to test the company directly.

No benchmark claim is shown. The page explains the limitation, preserves the visitor’s momentum, and routes to the company test action.

Want us to test your speed to lead?

Clay can test your inbound flow and show you exactly what happens after a buyer raises their hand.

Built by Clay

Find the gaps before your next high-intent lead does